LeBron and the Generational-Media Shift

If you like to track shifts in a cultural narrative and other such elite-sounding things (it really is not elite, of course, it could not be more grassroots), then you will want to take close notice of Michael Wilbon’s insights on the LeBron move to Miami.  Here is the pointed question:

In the wake of LeBron James’s decision, there’s no shortage of debate, starting with whether superstars should team up.

Wilbon wisely points out the difference between the old school and the new school, noting how a true old school player like Charles Barkley observed:

“In fairness, if I was 25 I’d try to win it by myself,” Barkley said. “Not technically ‘by myself,’ but I would want to be the guy. LeBron is never going to be the guy.”

My observation on this decision is different, and like Wilbon’s it is too multi-faceted to put into a neat box.  At the heart of this is a massive narrative shift in our culture.  The dots being connected in people’s minds about whether this is a good or bad decision are being connected based on certain assumptions about winning.  But that is an essentially man-made construct, and Freedom always leaves the door open for altering those constructs with a new set of assumptions.  And I believe a new set of assumptions have won out in LeBron’s mind, and whether they win out in the broader culture will have a lot to do with the fruit of his decision.  Follow me?

What I love about Wilbon is he always has the presence of mind to see through sports into the broader culture and its inequities and hypocrisies.  That’s why he is an irreplaceable voice for those willing to listen, even if he can be a little more dogmatic than most people like in other popular voices.  Wilbon gets there is a big difference between the old and new school, and he does not profess to know exactly how the difference will play itself out before us in this new NBA.

Because the impact of LeBron’s decision will unfold before us all over time, this whole thing has the power to shape the contours of a new cultural narrative in the mainstream of our culture.  And because Wilbon gets these deeper connections, I am eager to hear his commentary on this unfolding saga.  Because like it or not, LeBron will lead the new NBA forward in substantive ways to shape the global, Internet-driven communication environment in which we will live.  And thus, we need cultural interpreters with both an old and new school appreciation like Wilbon to help us make sense of this.  I am excited about that.

That said, let’s not forget one all-important thing: whether the old school individualist or new school collectivist narrative wins out will be determined on the frontlines of the league and of the culture.  No commentator or news network or top-down institution will own this new narrative.  The new communication environment is too open to allow for that.  That is a decisive break from the past, friends.

Because this deep shift taking in the NBA reflects that which is taking place in the broader culture, it would be wise to studiously fix your eyes on these developments, at least at a basic level.  As you think this through, here are three questions by which to make your own comparison between the relative merits of the new school collectivist approach:

  1. Does the beauty of the game itself increase with the new collusion between players off the court, so that they play well together on the court?  (don’t forget how great a passer LeBron is…)
  2. Does the quality of intensity and competition produced night-in and night-out, especially in the playoffs, increase as a result of LeBron’s decision?  In other words, will other players do the same thing, and sacrifice the money and come together to compete against the new trio?
  3. Will this teamwork translate positively into the broader culture?  More pointedly, will more young black men decide to come together and elevate their efforts in whatever they are doing, rather than just taking direct path to the biggest or easiest money?  Will they shoot for the rugged individualist’s pride or will they see the value of whole-greater-than-the-sum teamwork?

My prediction is that LeBron will be as big a new school leader as Michael Jordan was in the old school in his day…from a cultural perspective.   He may not be as much of a winner on the court as Michael, and perhaps he has as the old school guys have said, eliminated the possibility of being seen by the old school as an all-time great.   But the old school narrative is not authoritative, friends, and I think LeBron gets this.  His leap of faith–his decision to use the ESPN platform–is in my view a reflection on his awareness that he is on the forefront of a new cultural narrative, and perhaps he even sees that as a Black man and as an undoubted economic player in a global marketplace, this is the better path forward than the old school individualist path.

In other words, his impact on the broader culture narrative could be as seismic as Michael’s, if not more so, because he is coming of age in the middle of a global media shift that his generation will lead.  And now, with the vacuum left by Tiger Woods’ popular decline (though of course Woods course is not done), perhaps LeBron is smarter than all the old school stalwarts for knowing what time it is.  For the times they are a changing, more than we think.

This is a generational-media shift that I will elaborate upon later in detail in the not too distant future.  Standby.  Meanwhile, enjoy the competing narratives playing out in the popular debate.  It will be more than interesting.

Posted in Communication, Frontline Leadership, Media Democratization, Media Ecology, Sports | Leave a comment

LeBron, the NBA and Freedom

Part of me wants to call LeBron a big joker and a total narcissist for the way he created a media event out of his announcement to join the Miami heat.  Part of me also wants to agree with some of the criticism out there that says LeBron was totally disloyal to Cleveland and to the Cavaliers organization.  Part of me wants to agree with my friends who say this move was a sign of weakness, that he should have had enough confidence in his ability to win in Cleveland rather than colluding with fellow all stars D Wade and Chris Bosh in order to orchestrate a winning team.

But I think those parts of me get it wrong.  The more I think about this move, the more I like it.

I’ll qualify that by saying he could have been much more gracious to the people of Cleveland.  Like so many pro athletes, he seemed to lack a clear awareness of the fact that his wealth and fame are tied to a public trust, that people love the game of basketball and will pay big bucks to see great players play that beautiful game.  Big salaries, big arenas, big contracts cannot exist without this public trust.  Any lack of verbal recognition of that fact shows that our big time athletes lack a largeness of soul to match their massive talent. And this is a major knock on American pop culture, on our sports as a medium for corporate sponsorship, and on our love of luxury over loyalty at the highest levels in our society.  LeBron seems clearly to be part of those problems.

That said, this is like a game of pick up ball.  LeBron, Wade, and Bosh basically said “I got next.”  I love that.  That makes LeBron part of a major solution to the max contract-driven culture of sports. Like Tom Brady did with the Patriots in his most recent contract decisions to take less salary in order to build a winning team around him, LeBron has shown himself to be willing to sacrifice self for team in this way, and I love that fact.

I love that Kobe, Dwight Howard, Amare, Kevin Durant, and the other stars in the league now have to figure out how to come together to compete against this new all star trio. That makes the league much more intellectually engaging. Players are becoming owners of their own destiny and of the league. That increases competition and product quality, as the free markets teach us.

Lastly, I love this because it is an exhibition of freedom.  LeBron has said, albeit with mixed messages given the excessive media hype around this, that I am not defined by the pursuit of the largest contract I could get for myself.  And in that choice to take a smaller salary in order to build a better squad, he has moved freedom forward in a community that desperately need to put freedom to work on its behalf, over against the pursuit of luxury and bling–which ultimately oppress and shrink one’s soul and one’s culture over time.

The net of this for me is that I am now re-engaged in the NBA as a showcase for the best players in the world playing my favorite sport in the world.  And for that, I am grateful for what LeBron James has done, and I hope he and his team can deliver a new level of competition to elevate the game to the next level.

Posted in Sports | 1 Comment

Does uninvolvement remove responsibility

Does uninvolvement remove responsibility? WSJ says “BP Chief Says He Wasn’t Involved in Well Decisions.” Where was he? http://ow.ly/1ZYZv

Posted in General | 1 Comment

Ever wonder where info overload is going

Ever wonder where info overload is going in national defense? SIGNAL mag a good source. Check “Googlizing Intelligence” http://ow.ly/1Yg0o

Posted in General | Leave a comment

"None of this is good."

Larry Kudlow sees stocks down and gold up as “An Unholy Economic Combination.”  That has my attention.  It should yours, too.  So should this kind of fraternizing between the powerful and those who should be keeping them in check.

The rise in voter discontent to extreme levels is good in that it should be corrective to the 92% incumbency rate and also empowering to We the People, but it is not good to see the government falling so far short of the American ideal.  We need prudent, restrained self-government based on the sacred duty to honor life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.  We don’t have it.

None of this is exactly good.  But I know Someone who is.  And despite the fact that I know He does not take our responsibilities from us to self-govern, and thus the consequences are real and ours to handle, nonetheless there is common grace and their is special saving grace at work in thrilling ways.  Just the fact that we can vote –even if we rarely get compelling candidates that become effective public servants–is a wonderful reminder of our blood-bought freedoms.

In tough times, it’s critical to train your eyes to see the grace of God at work in our fallen world.  It’s also good to sleep deeply.  I’m going to bed.

Posted in Election | Leave a comment

Gen X Saves the World

From my friend Neil Howe’s Lifecourse Blog (I HIGHLY recommend you following him).

[vodpod id=Video.2678851&w=425&h=350&fv=%26rel%3D0%26border%3D0%26]

more about “Gen X Saves the World | Lifecourse Blog“, posted with vodpod
Posted in Generations | Leave a comment

What's Up In Heaven?

I sincerely hope Pink Floyd’s music makes it through the pearly gates, and even more than that I hope messrs Waters, Gilmore, Mason, Wright, and even Barrett make it up top.

This I know, I don’t think my Christian faith would be very strong were it not for the jarring experience of my mental categories being crushed by The Wall, and what Roger Waters had to say through it about the UK sending his father to a war he did not comprehend.

At my church, we are studying 1 Peter.  My friend Joshua Harris yesterday delivered a fine sermon on 1 Peter 1:13-21, focusing on the hard work required to “prepare your minds for action” and to “set your hope fully on the grace to be brought to you at the revelation of Christ Jesus.”  I have so many questions–questions about war, loss, far-reaching global financial decisions made without democratic representation in the process–just some basic questions about your everyday stuff.

This I know, too, Christ hates injustice more than anyone.  If our friends in the anti-war movement like Roger Waters have it right, and the military-industrial context is “the beast” that must feed (i.e., fight) to survive, then I can only imagine what final justice will be like for those who have sent so many into war to feed the machine.  Not that I am certain this is the right narrative for the world wars, but I am just thinking it through as if it were true.

I do this because I want to understand what it must be like for a deeply thoughtful and expressive guy like Roger Waters to look up at the edifice of human government and want to tear the wall down with his bare hands, if he believes that this is what took his father from him at such a young age.

I do this because I don’t ever want to look down the end of my nose at the suffering of those who lose their children in wars that they don’t understand–even if in the final political analysis these wars may have been necessary to remove the threat to greater evils gathering in the future.

Damn this fallen world.  Save this fallen world.  It’s enough to make you want to lose your mind.

Or prepare it for action, setting all hope not on this world but on the next.

I only wish someone were able to communicate to Waters that in Christ, it is possible to set all our cards on the table in this life and fearlessly pursue justice and peace in the name of Him who holds all authority in this world in the palm of His hand, knowing He will finally right all wrongs, even those we can’t fathom being made right or ourselves being made whole.

I’m done rambling.  Back to work.  Lord, may your kingdom come…

Posted in Christianity | Leave a comment

Ever wonder if the things you hope in wi

Ever wonder if the things you hope in will stand the test of time? Interested in a living hope? Check out 1 Peter at CLC. http://ow.ly/1GbIi

Posted in General | Leave a comment

Framing the 2010 Narrative (updated)

In the first year of my Master’s program of Communication Studies at Barry University, one of the Comm theories that caught my attention was what was called the “Agenda-Setting Function” of effective communication. In other words, if you can set the terms of the debate up front you have already gone a long way in determining who wins the debate.

Like all elections, the 2010 election will largely be decided by who best sets the agenda for debate. To use another good word for all of us to know, it is about the narrative, that frame of reference that most effectively connects the dots in the minds of the larger number of voters.

This is what public relations folks who come from Comm theory programs like mine become trained to do over time. Politicians, marketers, and journalists all do the same. It is a professional discipline that plays a major role in our lives, and if we do not have our own governing narratives to connect the dots in our own minds, we are more likely to be taken in by the narrative that most suits us and those people we aspire to be like.

So, with that, well, narrative, in mind, I call attention to Tim Kaine’s recent comments as relayed to us by the indispensable Mike Allen (read and subscribe to Mike’s Playbook here).

Allen relays in his Playbook email today that the Democrats will run this fall as the “Results Party.”

DNC Chairman Tim Kaine, speaking at a Christian Science Monitor lunch, lays out his side’s national midterm narrative and execution plan:

In registering voters and convincing voters to turn out for our candidates, we must give them a choice — and that means we’ll both tell our story and tell it in contrast to the other side. We have more accomplishments to run on than any Party in a long time. … Americans want results, and that’s what we’ve given them. … At a time when many Americans doubted the capacity of government to tackle and solve big problems, we have shown that we are the Results Party. … [V]oters will have a clear choice between continued progress and a return to the failed policies that created the biggest period of economic decline since the Great Depression…

Republicans have obstructed the President and worked to defeat his and the Democrats’ agenda for one primary reason — political calculation. They have placed their own politics above progress on our nation’s most pressing issues. Americans expect and appreciate a loyal opposition Party whose opposition is based in principle and genuine policy differences. But, we know for a fact that the Republicans set out before President Obama was even sworn into office with a plan to obstruct his agenda at all costs, no matter what the details, and notwithstanding that the American public wants to see meaningful cooperation at a time of significant economic crisis. From saying they wanted the President to fail and to break him politically, to trying to obstruct everything from health reform and the jobs bill, to blocking Administration appointments to sensitive national security posts, Republicans have failed to offer any positive vision for the country and instead just decided to go all in on a strategy of fighting against the President. Second, Republicans continue to put the interests of Wall Street above the needs, interests and financial security of Main Street…

“We’ve seen just how extreme and divisive the Republican Party has become. The level of extreme rhetoric emanating from Party leaders, often as part of a cynical strategy to manipulate people hurting in a tough time, is creating internal civil war within the GOP and increasingly striking a negative chord with American voters who are fundamentally optimistic about the nation and our need to work together in a tough time. So, although we know it stands to be a tough year for us based on history, we like the story we have to tell about our accomplishments and a Republican Party that lacks any vision but a desire to obstruct progress and appease lobbyists and others who have benefited from a status quo that has harmed everyday Americans.

Longer excerpt here.

For my part, I want to see the agenda-setting blown up by we the people and find ways to control the narrative by asking the basic question: “What results?”

Are all the results of the Obama administration and Democrat majority good for America?  For our children?  The overgrown government?  The wealth redistribution?  The broken campaign promises?

The fact that the Republicans tend to make the same mistakes is no justification for saying such results are acceptable.  It just means that we the people need to control more than just the agenda or the narrative.

This is the result I want to see: Citizen-driven government.  Constitutional, faithful, focused on what is best for our children (i.e., what is sustainable) and not primarily for one’s political supporters and campaign donors.

Such results will not be coming while the two party system is configured and funded as it is.  No way.

That’s why the DNC and RNC work so hard to set the agenda, rather than being plain dealers.  They have interests that are defined by their donors, not by their duties to the American people.  Both parties.

The more of us who realize what our representative democracy has become, the better.  I am NOT saying that it’s time to rush the gates of Congress.  We need to accept our own culpability in letting ourselves be taken in by the agenda-setting.  And we need to NOT accept Kaine’s, Steele’s, Obama’s, Palin’s, or anyone else’s agenda without careful analysis.  The stakes are too high (our children’s future opportunity spectrum, for one thing).

More than anything right now, I think we need to hear such speeches and remember that these people may not be as aligned with America’s true long-term interests as they profess.  And we need to use this new interactive media ecology to call them on that again and again.

Right?!

Posted in Election, US Politics, War of Ideas | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

"It's the playoffs"

Now this is old school!  In Friday night’s potentially series-clinching game against the Montreal Canadiens, Washington Capitals’ Eric Belanger felt his teeth shatter after taking a stick to the face.

After some dental work in the locker room, he put his hard hat back on and went out to work again.  Explains Belanger: “I knew I was in trouble, but what are you going to do? It’s the playoffs.”

I gotta think this is the kind of example that can provoke Belanger’s teammates to lay it all on the line each game the rest of the playoffs.  Knowing the disappointing performances of Caps teams in the past, I expect it will take such commitment to realize the full potential of this super-talented team.

Without a Stanley Cup in the organization’s past, this team has the great opportunity and difficulty of breaking through every part of the team culture that does not support its ultimate goal of winning it all.

And I am pretty sure that nothing less than holding the Cup at the end of this postseason will be worth the pain and sacrifice and toothless grins needed to get there.

Posted in Frontline Leadership, Sports | Leave a comment