If you like to track shifts in a cultural narrative and other such elite-sounding things (it really is not elite, of course, it could not be more grassroots), then you will want to take close notice of Michael Wilbon’s insights on the LeBron move to Miami. Here is the pointed question:
In the wake of LeBron James’s decision, there’s no shortage of debate, starting with whether superstars should team up.
Wilbon wisely points out the difference between the old school and the new school, noting how a true old school player like Charles Barkley observed:
“In fairness, if I was 25 I’d try to win it by myself,” Barkley said. “Not technically ‘by myself,’ but I would want to be the guy. LeBron is never going to be the guy.”
My observation on this decision is different, and like Wilbon’s it is too multi-faceted to put into a neat box. At the heart of this is a massive narrative shift in our culture. The dots being connected in people’s minds about whether this is a good or bad decision are being connected based on certain assumptions about winning. But that is an essentially man-made construct, and Freedom always leaves the door open for altering those constructs with a new set of assumptions. And I believe a new set of assumptions have won out in LeBron’s mind, and whether they win out in the broader culture will have a lot to do with the fruit of his decision. Follow me?
What I love about Wilbon is he always has the presence of mind to see through sports into the broader culture and its inequities and hypocrisies. That’s why he is an irreplaceable voice for those willing to listen, even if he can be a little more dogmatic than most people like in other popular voices. Wilbon gets there is a big difference between the old and new school, and he does not profess to know exactly how the difference will play itself out before us in this new NBA.
Because the impact of LeBron’s decision will unfold before us all over time, this whole thing has the power to shape the contours of a new cultural narrative in the mainstream of our culture. And because Wilbon gets these deeper connections, I am eager to hear his commentary on this unfolding saga. Because like it or not, LeBron will lead the new NBA forward in substantive ways to shape the global, Internet-driven communication environment in which we will live. And thus, we need cultural interpreters with both an old and new school appreciation like Wilbon to help us make sense of this. I am excited about that.
That said, let’s not forget one all-important thing: whether the old school individualist or new school collectivist narrative wins out will be determined on the frontlines of the league and of the culture. No commentator or news network or top-down institution will own this new narrative. The new communication environment is too open to allow for that. That is a decisive break from the past, friends.
Because this deep shift taking in the NBA reflects that which is taking place in the broader culture, it would be wise to studiously fix your eyes on these developments, at least at a basic level. As you think this through, here are three questions by which to make your own comparison between the relative merits of the new school collectivist approach:
- Does the beauty of the game itself increase with the new collusion between players off the court, so that they play well together on the court? (don’t forget how great a passer LeBron is…)
- Does the quality of intensity and competition produced night-in and night-out, especially in the playoffs, increase as a result of LeBron’s decision? In other words, will other players do the same thing, and sacrifice the money and come together to compete against the new trio?
- Will this teamwork translate positively into the broader culture? More pointedly, will more young black men decide to come together and elevate their efforts in whatever they are doing, rather than just taking direct path to the biggest or easiest money? Will they shoot for the rugged individualist’s pride or will they see the value of whole-greater-than-the-sum teamwork?
My prediction is that LeBron will be as big a new school leader as Michael Jordan was in the old school in his day…from a cultural perspective. He may not be as much of a winner on the court as Michael, and perhaps he has as the old school guys have said, eliminated the possibility of being seen by the old school as an all-time great. But the old school narrative is not authoritative, friends, and I think LeBron gets this. His leap of faith–his decision to use the ESPN platform–is in my view a reflection on his awareness that he is on the forefront of a new cultural narrative, and perhaps he even sees that as a Black man and as an undoubted economic player in a global marketplace, this is the better path forward than the old school individualist path.
In other words, his impact on the broader culture narrative could be as seismic as Michael’s, if not more so, because he is coming of age in the middle of a global media shift that his generation will lead. And now, with the vacuum left by Tiger Woods’ popular decline (though of course Woods course is not done), perhaps LeBron is smarter than all the old school stalwarts for knowing what time it is. For the times they are a changing, more than we think.
This is a generational-media shift that I will elaborate upon later in detail in the not too distant future. Standby. Meanwhile, enjoy the competing narratives playing out in the popular debate. It will be more than interesting.

